Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathryn Dolmans's avatar

Gary, I’m with you that AI will produce endlessly scalable “influencers,” and brands will love the control. I’m less certain about the endgame. Once the audience feels the relationship is engineered, it stops feeling like influence and starts feeling like manipulation. That won’t land evenly. There’ll be plenty of engagement, but I think there’s an “ick” ceiling, and brands that lean on it too hard risk eroding trust.

I also think we’re headed for a pendulum swing toward a different kind of influence: not permission, but challenge. Humans can bring contradiction, boundaries, and consequences; AI is trained to soothe, agree, and personalize. So yes, AI influencers will exist and sell, but the premium may shift to creators who create productive tension: challenge taste, say no, and make people a little uncomfortable in the way that actually leads to a breakthrough. In an AI-saturated world, the most valuable creator might be the one who can introduce healthy friction. And that role feels hard to automate.

Subhrajyoti Mahato's avatar

It doesn't matter if we like it or not we have to adapt.

Surfing the AI wave is the safest option.

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?